Away from Win-Lose
As a zero-sum system,
traditional money
is more suited to reward collaboration.
As every financial record is a
win-lose interaction,
it embeds conflict within our actual dealings by making one person a winner, the other a loser.
A more accurate accounting system would be able to represent transactions anywhere on the below axes:
Win-Win
interactions are ones that both parties see as beneficial.
For example - a homeless person looking after an empty house,
two friends meeting up for a chat or someone with a disposal
problem finding someone who actually wants the goods that are in surplus.
Win-win interactions are least likely to be formally accounted,
perhaps because of the race memory of the
gift economy that formed the basis of traditional economies.
Lose-Lose interactions, by contrast, are the most commonly monetized.
Since they decrease the welfare of all parties involved, they represent a dead loss to society, as
everyone loses out. It is highly regrettable that modern societies are suffering a
rapid increase in rent-seeking and other
lose-lose interactions,
in which both parties undergo unwanted experiences.
Money transfers, especially selfish maximisation of profits motivate
all manner of such socially destructive practices including predatory lending,
frivolous lawsuits, exploitation of legal loopholes, pernicious information hiding etc.
A society with many interactions in the top right (win-win) quadrant
can be termed 'healthy' since both parties consider such transactions to boost their welfare.
In such a society, the dominant
social cycles are likely to be of the positive, life-affirming type
rather than the reverse, conflict-based type.
Single-value scoring, such as the
competitive system of traditional money does not, alas, allow
these cases to be identified:(
 | As the economic sphere swells,
ever more activity are brought under
zero-sum, financial jurisdiction.
This is leading to a rapid increase in lose-lose activity,
resulting in ever more destructive and wasteful activity. Even as ths happens, new
technology is opening up opportunities for altruistic cooperation,
such as www.wikipedia.org
and Linux.
To magnify the importance of altruistic interactions, the first thing we need is
an economic system that can identify them!
Altruistic Economics was designed with a
multiple value scoring system, so everyone has a chance to
independently state their perception of the value of a transaction.
An interaction between X and Y can have a result anywhere on the axes shown above.
|
 |
Human interaction is not
zero-sum, and to rid ourselves of a short-sighted,
money-obsessed view of what constitutes 'profitable' activity we need an alternative system of
economics that reflects this!